Harry Potter and his magical world entertained a generation and brought the message of the perils of Nazism and blood supremacy to the forefront, through the actions of Voldemort and his Death Eaters – Magic is Might!
Harry and his motley crew of rebels eventually bring this reign of terror to an end, and yet, it seems to be by the very same standards. Harry was an orphan, he never knew his parents and was raised by his non-magical Aunt and Uncle, along with his cousin Dudley. We do suffer through JK’s fatphobia at multiple times throughout the books, and her disdain for children who might overeat or watch TV. But despite Harry being raised by the ‘worst kind of muggles’ he grows into a stunning resemblance of his mother and father. Not only in looks, but also in character. In fact, another effective orphan, Neville, is the same, growing into the man to make his parents proud. Each family, despite separations or any tribulations, seem to stay true to the character and resemblance of the family line.
‘If there is something wrong with the bitch, there is something wrong with the pup’.
There is something very wrong with JK Rowling, and there is something very wrong with Harry Potter.
It is the very blood Harry is born with, the blood of his parents, of Ignotius Peverell, that is so key to his personality, his ‘moral superiority’ and his eventual triumph. It is his mother’s kindness that Snape finally recognises in her likeness in Harry’s eyes, despite his reckless troublemaking that Snape had so quickly noticed was like his father.
It is the blood/genetics you are born with.
It is your gender as your sex assigned at birth.
JK Rowling is a blood supremacist that wishes to rewrite the world according to her ideas of what makes people worthy, or ‘better’ than one another. JK Rowling believes blood will out. She uses the might the books have given her to crush those who she deems inferior. Just like Harry, she is not above the unforgivable when acting for her aim. Sadly, the key difference between Harry and Voldemort is not a moral superiority – it is just the person with the qualities JK prefers that is who she wants to see triumph, despite the fact neither have made many of their own choices- they are how they were born. JK Rowling is not a moral person and should never be looked to as such. She wants her personal preferences to be the standard. She is her own worst enemy laying this out so clearly in Harry Potter and playing this out so clearly in Trans political issues. She is a woman full of hypocrisy, and personal hates and bigotry, who denies others have choice and agency in their lives and wants to force the world into her line.
Add comment
Comments